The Milwaukee Bucks vs Pacers Match Player Stats provide a detailed picture of an exciting NBA encounter between the Milwaukee Bucks and the Indiana Pacers. In their latest meeting on 26 October 2026, the Bucks secured a hard-fought 110–102 victory at Fiserv Forum in Milwaukee, earning their first win of the 2026–27 regular season. Tyler Herro led the home side with an impressive all-round performance, while Tyrese Haliburton and Pascal Siakam produced strong individual displays for Indiana.
ESPN+1
The contest featured changes in momentum, important three-point shots, strong rebounding and a decisive fourth-quarter run. Examining the individual statistics helps explain how Milwaukee recovered from a difficult second quarter and eventually secured the eight-point victory.
Milwaukee Bucks vs Pacers Match Overview
The game took place on Monday, 26 October 2026, at Fiserv Forum. Indiana started brightly and scored 32 points in the second quarter, but Milwaukee responded after half-time with a powerful offensive performance.
Milwaukee Bucks
Home team
110
Away team
Indiana Pacers
102
Venue: Fiserv Forum, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Date: 26 October 2026 · Final margin: Bucks by 8 points
Quarter-by-quarter score
| Quarter | Milwaukee Bucks | Indiana Pacers |
|---|---|---|
| First | 31 | 29 |
| Second | 19 | 32 |
| Third | 34 | 24 |
| Fourth | 26 | 17 |
| Final score | 110 | 102 |
The quarter-by-quarter figures show that Indiana’s second-quarter advantage was not enough to secure the win. Milwaukee outscored the Pacers by ten points in the third quarter and maintained its advantage in the final period.
SI+1
Milwaukee Bucks Player Stats
Milwaukee’s victory came from a balanced offensive effort rather than the contribution of a single player. Herro led the scoring, while Ryan Rollins, Kyle Kuzma and Kel’el Ware added valuable points. Ware’s work on the boards was particularly important.
1. Tyler Herro: The standout performer
Tyler Herro delivered the most complete performance of the evening, finishing with 23 points, 10 rebounds and seven assists. His scoring helped Milwaukee maintain pressure on Indiana, while his rebounding and passing provided additional value.
Herro converted seven of his 14 field-goal attempts and made three three-pointers. He also scored six points from the free-throw line. His double-digit rebound total was an important part of his contribution, particularly in a contest where second-chance opportunities mattered.
2. Ryan Rollins: A reliable scoring option
Ryan Rollins contributed 19 points, four assists and two rebounds. He shot seven of 14 from the field and connected on three three-pointers.
Rollins gave Milwaukee another dependable scoring option alongside Herro. His contribution helped prevent Indiana’s defence from concentrating exclusively on one player.
3. Kyle Kuzma: Important perimeter shooting
Kyle Kuzma finished with 17 points, seven rebounds and three assists. He made six of his ten field-goal attempts, including four of six from beyond the three-point line.
His long-range shooting became especially valuable when Milwaukee needed to create breathing room late in the fourth quarter. Kuzma’s ability to score from outside helped stretch Indiana’s defensive coverage.
4. Kel’el Ware: Dominant on the boards
Kel’el Ware recorded 16 points and 14 rebounds, producing a double-double. He made seven of 13 field-goal attempts and converted both of his free throws.
Ware’s rebounding helped Milwaukee control possessions and limit Indiana’s opportunities to recover missed shots. His contribution demonstrated that interior play can be just as decisive as perimeter scoring.
Other notable Bucks contributions
Jaime Jaquez Jr. added eight points and six rebounds, while Kasparas Jakučionis scored seven points and supplied five assists. Myles Turner finished with six points, but his defensive work and a late offensive rebound also helped the Bucks protect their lead.
SI+1
Indiana Pacers Player Stats
Indiana had several impressive individual performances, but the team struggled to maintain its offensive efficiency in the second half. Tyrese Haliburton led the scoring, Pascal Siakam provided strength in the paint, and Obi Toppin contributed useful points from the bench.
1. Tyrese Haliburton: Indiana’s leading scorer
Haliburton recorded 22 points, six rebounds and nine assists. He made eight of his 17 field-goal attempts, including four three-pointers from ten attempts.
His nine assists demonstrated his importance as Indiana’s primary playmaker. He created opportunities for team-mates and helped the Pacers build their half-time advantage. However, Milwaukee’s defensive adjustments limited Indiana’s effectiveness late in the game.
2. Pascal Siakam: A powerful all-round display
Siakam finished with 20 points, 13 rebounds and six assists. He made eight of 17 field-goal attempts and converted three of his four free throws.
His rebounding was particularly valuable, allowing Indiana to compete physically against Milwaukee’s frontcourt. Nevertheless, Siakam’s efforts were not enough to prevent the Bucks from controlling the closing stages.
3. Obi Toppin: An important bench contribution
Toppin scored 14 points and collected six rebounds. He shot six of 13 from the field and added two three-pointers.
His scoring helped Indiana remain competitive, although the Pacers needed more consistent contributions during the fourth quarter.
4. Aaron Nesmith: Effective from three-point range
Nesmith scored 13 points, making five of 11 field-goal attempts and three of seven three-point attempts. He also recorded one steal and one block.
His perimeter shooting gave Indiana another offensive option, but the team could not sustain that threat when Milwaukee increased its defensive intensity.
Other notable Pacers performances
Jarace Walker recorded 10 points, eight rebounds, two steals and two blocks. Kelly Oubre Jr. contributed nine points, three rebounds and two blocks, while Jay Huff finished with six points and six rebounds.
These performances demonstrated Indiana’s range of contributions, although the team’s overall shooting efficiency declined as the game progressed.
SI+1
Complete Match Player Stats Table
The following table highlights the leading performers from both teams in the 26 October encounter.
| Player | Team | Points | Rebounds | Assists |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tyler Herro | Bucks | 23 | 10 | 7 |
| Tyrese Haliburton | Pacers | 22 | 6 | 9 |
| Pascal Siakam | Pacers | 20 | 13 | 6 |
| Ryan Rollins | Bucks | 19 | 2 | 4 |
| Kyle Kuzma | Bucks | 17 | 7 | 3 |
| Kel’el Ware | Bucks | 16 | 14 | 0 |
| Obi Toppin | Pacers | 14 | 6 | 2 |
| Aaron Nesmith | Pacers | 13 | 0 | 1 |
| Jarace Walker | Pacers | 10 | 8 | 2 |
| Kelly Oubre Jr. | Pacers | 9 | 3 | 1 |
Source: Published match box scores. Statistics reflect the 26 October 2026 game.
SI+1
Team Statistics: Bucks vs Pacers
Individual performances tell only part of the story. The team statistics reveal why Milwaukee eventually prevailed.
| Statistical category | Bucks | Pacers |
|---|---|---|
| Total points | 110 | 102 |
| Field goals made | 41 | 39 |
| Field-goal attempts | 95 | 96 |
| Field-goal percentage | 43.2% | 40.6% |
| Three-pointers made | 13 | 13 |
| Three-point percentage | 29.5% | 27.1% |
| Free throws made | 15 | 11 |
| Rebounds | 61 | 48 |
| Assists | 27 | 27 |
| Turnovers | 11 | 13 |
HoopMetrics+1
Rebounding gave Milwaukee an advantage
The Bucks recorded 61 rebounds compared with Indiana’s 48. This 13-rebound difference helped Milwaukee create additional possessions and reduce the Pacers’ opportunities to recover missed shots.
Ware’s 14 rebounds were particularly significant. His presence around the basket supported Milwaukee’s second-half recovery and helped the team finish stronger.
Better shooting efficiency made a difference
Milwaukee converted 43.2 per cent of its field-goal attempts, compared with Indiana’s 40.6 per cent. Both sides made 13 three-pointers, but the Bucks were more accurate from beyond the arc.
Milwaukee also made 15 of 21 free throws, while Indiana converted 11 of 18. Those additional points helped the home side establish a winning margin.
Ball security helped the Bucks close the game
Milwaukee committed 11 turnovers against Indiana’s 13. Although the difference was modest, fewer lost possessions helped the Bucks maintain control during crucial stretches.
How Milwaukee Won the Match
The decisive period came after half-time. Indiana entered the break with a strong advantage after scoring 32 points in the second quarter, while Milwaukee managed only 19.
The Bucks responded with 34 points in the third quarter, changing the game’s direction. Herro’s scoring, improved offensive execution and contributions from Rollins and Kuzma helped Milwaukee regain control.
In the fourth quarter, Indiana struggled to convert its chances. The Pacers scored just 17 points, allowing Milwaukee to protect its advantage and secure the win.
Reuters+1
The importance of Milwaukee’s defence
Milwaukee’s defensive improvement was essential. The Bucks limited Indiana’s scoring opportunities and forced difficult shots, particularly late in the contest.
Myles Turner’s defensive contribution was also notable. Even though he scored only six points, his rim protection and work on the glass helped Milwaukee defend its lead.
What the Result Means for Both Teams
For Milwaukee, the victory offered an encouraging sign after a difficult opening to the season. Herro’s balanced performance and Ware’s rebounding showed how multiple players could contribute in different ways.
For Indiana, the defeat highlighted the importance of maintaining offensive consistency. Haliburton and Siakam delivered strong performances, but the team’s fourth-quarter shooting problems proved costly.
The result also underlined the importance of squad depth and player availability. Indiana entered the contest with several players unavailable, making it more difficult to sustain its performance across all four quarters.
ESPN+1
Conclusion
The Milwaukee Bucks vs Pacers Match Player Stats from 26 October 2026 reveal a contest decided by second-half adjustments, rebounding and shooting efficiency. Milwaukee defeated Indiana 110–102 after overcoming a difficult second quarter.
Tyler Herro led the Bucks with 23 points, 10 rebounds and seven assists, while Kel’el Ware recorded 16 points and 14 rebounds. For Indiana, Haliburton contributed 22 points and nine assists, and Siakam added 20 points with 13 rebounds.
Ultimately, Milwaukee’s stronger third quarter, superior rebounding and more effective execution in the closing minutes secured the victory. The statistics provide a clear explanation of how the Bucks turned a challenging game into an important early-season win. Time Goal